2000 (4) TMI 518

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... [Order per : Dr. S.N. Busi, Member (T)]. The issue for consideration is whether the broken sleepers removed for remelting within factory of production are liable to pay excise duty or whether such goods are eligible for exemption under Notification No. 217/86-C.E., dated 2-4-1986. 2. Shri K.B. Chakraborty, learned Advocate, submits that the sleepers which were recorded in RG-1 register, on .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... at since the broken C.I. sleepers are themselves finished goods, they cannot be treated as intermediary products under Notification No. 217/86-C.E. and hence the claim for exemption under the said Notification is legally incorrect. He further pleaded that Appellant ought to have discharged duty liability on the broken sleepers under the provisions of Rules 9 and 49 of the Central Excise Rules, 194 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X