TMI Blog2001 (7) TMI 547X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nue has filed the present appeal against the orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) vide which he has rejected the Revenue s Appeal filed before him. 2. The dispute relates to the Modvat credit of Rs. 6,57,614/- availed by the respondents on 13 items as capital goods. The respondents Judicial Central Excise Authorities were of the view that some of the items were not properly declared by the respo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... included in the Sl. No. 82 of the declaration dated 25-5-1994. Invoice No. 04060, dated 20-2-1996 of M/s. Jyoti Ltd., Vadodara under which the same item was purchased also shows the tariff Heading as 8501.00. (2) The appellant pointed out that they received the turbine in March 96 and started availing the accumulated credit from June 96. The accumulated credit included the previous unutilized ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... (1) It was alleged that three phase horizontal brushless alternator and AVR are parts of generator and their classification also varies. But in review order no alternative classification for this item were smuggled. Rather, the appellant produced invoice for purchase of the same which clearly shows the item has been classified under 8501.00 ; and the same has been declared in Sl. No. 82 of decl ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 501.00 and declared in Sl. No. 82 of declaration dated 25-5-1994. So the allegation that declaration was not submitted for those items does not appear to be correct. The appellant also submitted declaration for cable on 21-10-1995 and acknowledged on 26-10-1995. Hence the allegation of non-submission of declaration is found to be unsubstantiated. 4. After hearing both the sides duly represented ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|