9911796707
TMI Blog1977 (1) TMI 121X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ful no valid ground to interfere with the judgment of the High Court, dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant. - C.A. No. 568 of 1972, - - - Dated:- 18-1-1977 - KHANNA H.R., SARKARIA R.S. AND JASWANT SINGH JJ. Ram Panjwani, Senior Advocate, and H.S. Parihar, Advocate, for the respondents Nos. 1 and 2. G.L. Sanghi, Senior Advocate (S.K. Mehta, K.R. Nagaraja and P.N. Puri, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... operties belonging to the appellant. The said properties were sold by auction on December 8, 1961. Respondent No. 3 was the highest bidder in those auction-sales. He gave a bid of Rs. 12,000 for the immovable property and of Rs. 21,000 for the movable property. The appellant, after agitating the matter before the revenue authorities, filed petition under article 226 of the Constitution to challeng ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... o rule 11, every notice shall be served by tendering or delivering a copy of it to the person concerned personally or to his recognised agent. Rule 12 provides that where the person concerned cannot be found and has no recognised agent, service may be made on any adult male member of the person (sic) concerned, who is residing with him. Rule 13 is to the effect that where the serving officer deliv ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... cess-server shows that before he affixed the notice, a partner of the appellant-firm had declined to accept the notice. There are a number of other reports which also show that the partners of the appellant declined on various occasions to accept notices which were sent to them in connection with the recovery proceedings. There can also be no manner of doubt that the partners of the appellant-firm ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
