2002 (3) TMI 455

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. The application by the appellant for modification was taken up for hearing today with the consent of both sides. 2. Of the two grounds in the application, the one relating to the use of the brand name Vijay has already been considered and no reasons are advanced as to why we should consider the same again. The other claim is of financial hardship. The T .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ncial hardship on the last occasion, the Tribunal is certainly required to consider such evidence. However, no such valid reason is advanced. It has not sought any adjournment on this ground nor is there any claim. We, therefore, decline to consider this plea. 4. If the applicant does not deposit the amount in question within 45 days from today and report compliance on 28-3-2002, its appeal is l .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X