9911796707
TMI Blog2002 (1) TMI 1031X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... missioner of Central Excise, Jaipur, vide his two Orders-in-Original Nos. 124/96 and 193/96 both dated 14-2-96 denied the Modvat credit of Rs. 1,11,115/- and Rs. 50,842/- availed by the party on the strength of the invoices issued by the Jaipur depot of M/s. SAIL on the ground that the appellants had availed the excess Modvat credit of the aforesaid amounts which were not admissible to them. The A ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... for the act done by M/s. SAIL. 2. The party filed the appeals against the aforesaid two orders of the Assistant Commissioner but the Commissioner (Appeals), Jaipur, vide his order dated 17-10-2000 rejected the appeals upholding the orders passed by the original authority. 3. These appeals are against the impugned order of the Commissioner (Appeals), Jaipur. I have heard Shri K.K. Anand, ld. A ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... in support of his contentions :- (1) Shree Krishna Rolling Mills Ltd. v. CCE, Jaipur [2001 (129) E.L.T. 722 (T)] (2) Modern Malleables Limited v. CCE, Calcutta [2000 (122) E.L.T. 270 (T)]. 4. I have considered these submissions made before me. As per the rules framed under the Modvat credit scheme, the assessee is eligible to avail the Modvat credit only of the amount as reflected in ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... any irregularity in passing off the Modvat credit to the manufacturers then they should have made party to the proceedings. This being the position on facts and in law, the impugned order cannot be sustained and the same is accordingly set aside. The matter is remanded to the original authority to issue a notice and make M/s. SAIL depot as party to the proceedings spelling out the charges relatin ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
