9911796707
TMI Blog1998 (7) TMI 564X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ent. ORDER Justice EJ. Bellie, President - The 1st opposite party-Unit Trust of India against which an award has been passed by the District Forum is the appellant. The complainant purchased 3,000 units from the 1st opposite party, the value of it being Rs. 30,000. It became matured on 30-6-1994. After the maturity the complainant made a demand for payment. It appears the 1st opposite pa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... arty no question of reinvestment arose. Therefore, the complainant wanted payment of the matured amount from the 1st opposite party. But payment was not made. Alleging deficien-cy in service on the part of the opposite party, the complaint was filed. 2. The 2nd opposite party is the Senior Post Master, Control Division, T. Nagar Post Office, from where the cheques were despatched to the addres ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ome fraud had been committed by some persons during transit and, therefore, no question of deficiency in service would arise so far as the 1st opposite party is concerned. But we are unable to agree with this argument. When the units had matured the 1st opposite party is bound to pay the amount to the complainant. It is true that the 1st opposite party had sent 2 cheques for the matured amount t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
