TMI Blog2001 (5) TMI 844X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. This is an application filed under the provision of Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellants have prayed for review of order No. A-94-95, dt. 23-1-2001 passed by the Tribunal vide which the quantum of personal penalties imposed upon them was reduced to 25% in each case. 2. Shri R.N. Das, ld. Sr. Adv. ap ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ers - 2000 (118) E.L.T. 248 (T-LB) = 2000 (38) RLT 600 (CEGAT-LB), has held that the Asstt. Commissioner has unlimited monetary powers for issuing demand notice for the normal period of limitation. As such the appellants contention that the Asstt. Commissioner was having no jurisdiction to decide the present matter does not have any merits. The same is accordingly rejected. 4. As regards the ap ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|