1999 (7) TMI 585

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... opposite party No. 1, Mr. Paresh Shah. Opposite Party No. 1 is related to complainant No. 2, who is the wife of complainant No. 1. Mr. Paresh Shah is working as sub-broker with S.A. Deshpande Co. The said shares were sold by Paresh Shah vide the confirmation memo dated 24-6-1996 and 26-6-1996 and the price realised was Rs. 5,20,152.50. For A group shares and Rs. 47,345 for B group shares. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . 1, Mr. Paresh Shah has tendered the xerox copy of the delivery book of 25,000 Finalysis Ltd. shares but the handwriting expert Mr. Parmeshwar Dayal M.A. has given a clear opinion that when he compared the signature on the delivery of Mr. C.M. Parekh, the signature of the complainant No. 1 is not the genuine signature. We have carried out the visual inspection of the signature on delivery book an .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ah Co. and we feel that O.P. No. 1 is responsible to make the payment of Rs. 5,67,497 which we round up to Rs. 5,67,000. The said amount shall carry interest at 15 per cent from 1-7-1996. The Opposite Party No. 1 further pay Rs. 10,000 by way of cost to the complainants. We do not see any merit that the matter should be referred to the Civil Court. The conclusions are supported by important do .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X