2001 (10) TMI 955

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ondal, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of motor vehicles and its parts and accessories. The short point involved in the present appeal is as to whether during the period in question i.e. from 1st December, 1990 to 25th May, 1994, Cess is leviable in respect of parts and accessories under the provisions of Se .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... by the appellants showing the levy of Cess only on motor vehicles. RT-12 returns were finally assessed. He submits that as non-payment of Cess on parts and accessories of motor vehicles was known to the Department and as the Cess was not being paid with the consent of Revenue, the proviso to Section 11A is not invocable. He submits that after the exemption Notification was issued on 26-5-94, the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nted the proper officer to direct the appellants to pay Cess on the said goods and approve the Classification Lists accordingly. The approval of the Classification Lists showing non-payment of Cess in respect of the parts and accessories, only reflects upon the understanding of the Revenue that the said parts and accessories were not leviable to Cess. In these circumstances, it cannot be said that .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X