9911796707
TMI Blog2000 (1) TMI 905X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Gupta for the Respondent. JUDGMENT 1. This order will dispose of Company Application Nos. 280 and 543 of 1999. It is the case of the applicant that the premises which have been sealed by the Liquidator, viz., House No. 2015/2, Sayantara, Sadashiv Peth, Tilak Road, Near Graha Peth, Pune-400 030, belong to the applicant. These premises were let out to Ecoline Development Engineers Ltd ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... is further the case of the applicant that the business of the company has come to a standstill. The premises are not being used for the purpose of the office or production of the company for which purpose it was let out. It is further the case of the applicant that since the premises are not being used for the purpose for which it was let out, the applicant is entitled to possession under the Bom ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pleading in the Small Causes Court, it becomes apparent that the applicant in company Application No. 543 of 1999 are sub-tenants of the company under liquidation. He has further submitted that the premises had, in fact, been taken from the company under liquidation with the express consent of the landlord, i.e., the applicant in Company Application No. 280 of 1999. He, therefore, submits that ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... le of the managing director of the company under liquidation. Keeping the aforesaid facts in view it becomes apparent that the premises have been let out to the company under liquidation in the year 1980. It also becomes apparent that since 1986 the applicant in Company Application No. 543 of 1999 has been inducted into the premises. Merely because the company in Company Application No. 543 of 199 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
