2001 (12) TMI 770

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ankar, Member (T)]. The appeal is against the order of the Commissioner holding that the goods manufactured by the appellant were not entitled to exemption contained in Notifications 1/93, 38/97 and 9/98 for the reason that a condition contained in each of the notifications, that the goods should not bear brand name of any other person, had been contravened. 2. The Commissioner found that .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X