TMI Blog2003 (5) TMI 255X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 2. Duty has been demanded from Aafloat Textiles on quantities of goods imported by it and cleared in terms of special imprest licences, which rendered the goods eligible for partial exemption from duty as contained in Notification No. 117/94. The basis of the charge that the licences were forged is not denied by any of the applicants. The claim on behalf of the importer and, S.N. Baheti Prakash K. Mehta, its Chairman and Managing Director respectively, on each of whom penalty of Rs. 25,000/- under Section 112 is imposed, is that they purchased these licences in the ordinary course of business from Ketan Shah and Mahendra Shah and did not have reason to believe that they are forged. It is emphasized that no evidence has been sought to sho ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... taken into account. We therefore think it appropriate to ask each of these applicants to deposit Rs. 5 lakhs. 5. Mahendra Shah and Kamlesh Mehta, on each of whom penalties of Rs. 50 lakhs and Rs. 25 lakhs respectively have been imposed, were the brokers who supplied licences to the importer. The notice alleges that Mahendra Shah is in fact the main person concerned, having created four firms in the name of Kamlesh Mehta, his employee, in order to transact in forged licences. Heavy emphasis is placed in the order upon the fact that Mahendra Shah, in his statements recorded under Section 108 of the Act, accepted that he was aware of the licences that he purchased from Pradeep Saraogi, Mahendra Kothari and Atul Goradia were forged and that, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ion by him in the venture. The contention of financial hardship that he has no income other than that from retail sale of plastic articles for the past three years is not rebutted by the Departmental Representative. Therefore, we waive deposit of the penalty imposed on him and stay its recovery. 8. The contentions on behalf of Atul Goradia, broker, who sold the licences to Mahendra Shah and Kamlesh Mehta are essentially the admission of knowledge contained in the statement and should not be relied upon as it is retracted. Here again, there is an interval of a number of days according to his statements and their retraction, for which no explanation was given. There is no evidence whatsoever in support of financial hardship in the applicati ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|