2003 (7) TMI 335

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... et Singh, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order]. In this appeal, the Revenue has questioned the validity of the impugned order-in-appeal dated 8-1-2003 vide which the Commissioner (Appeals) had affirmed the order-in-original dated 30-6-1995 of the Asstt. Commissioner allowing refund of Rs. 13,640.31. 2. The respondents are a 100% EOU. They filed a refund claim of the above said amount .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of 5% which they paid. From the record, I find that not an iota of evidence has been adduced by the Department to show that the duty charged from the customers by the respondents, was not @ 5% but 10%. Even in the show cause notice, it had not been so alleged, as is evident from the perusal of the impugned order itself. Therefore, I do not find any sufficient ground to disagree with the findings o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X