2003 (8) TMI 225

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... The issue involved in this appeal filed by M/s. Demosha Chemicals Limited is whether the excise duty is leviable on Spent Sulphuric Acid. 2. Shri J.C. Patel, learned Advocate, submitted that the Appellants manufacture Sodium Hydrosulphite Acid and other chemicals and avail of Modvat credit of the duty paid on the inputs; that Oleum, which is a concentrated sulphuric acid, is one of the inputs .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ld not be charged to duty again; that as per the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of CCE, Vadodara v. Dhiren Chemical Industries, 2002 (143) E.L.T. 19 (S.C.), CBEC s circulars are binding on Revenue even if placing different interpretation than given by the Supreme Court. 3. I also heard Shri H. Kothikar, learned SDR for Revenue, who reiterated the findings as contained in the two order .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Supreme Court in the case of CCE, Vadodara v. Dhiren Chemical Industries, 2002 (139) E.L.T. 3 (S.C.) that regardless of the interpretation that we have placed on the said phrase, if there are Circulars which have been issued by the Central Board of Excise Customs which place a different interpretation upon the said phrase, that interpretation will be binding upon the Revenue. The Supreme Court .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X