2003 (8) TMI 337

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. In its stay order pronounced on 22-5-2003, the Tribunal did not accept the contention of the applicant that the sum required to be paid by it following the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) were not required to be paid because it had settled the issue under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998. The Tribunal noted that the order of the designated au .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... cheme to go into the extraneous matters and his function was to determine the declaration filed was qualified for acceptance. 2. In its order, the Tribunal had noted of these points. Further, the Tribunal cannot go into the exemption and decide upon the action of a designated authority under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998. Based upon this prima facie view of the matter, the Tribunal had ask .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X