9911796707
TMI Blog2003 (3) TMI 536X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... his is a company petition filed by the petitioner under section 433( e ) of the Companies Act seeking winding-up of the respondent-company - a limited company engaged inter alia in the business of manufacture of tubes. A winding-up is sought essentially on the ground of inability to pay admitted debt amounting to Rs. 3,58,76,265.67 paise. It is the case of petitioner that they supplied in course of their business dealing goods worth Rs.2,42,87,876.67 paise to respondent on various dates against the orders placed by the respondent-company and accordingly invoices were raised on 25-2-1998 to 16-4-1998 by the petitioner on the respondent. It is contended that despite receipt of the goods, and admitting the liability, the respondents did not ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... made out. 4. On behalf of the respondent-company a shelter of section 22 of SICA is taken. According to respondent, since the reference under section 15 of SICA is pending before the BIFR being reference case No. 303 of 2002 and hence, the proceedings be either stayed or deferred in these matters. 5. Heard Shri BA Chitale, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Vivek Saran for respondent. 6. It is brought to the notice of this court that this Court has already directed the BIFR for disposal of the reference case 303 of 2002 in relation to respondent-company within six months. This direction is given by this court in Writ Petition No. 1945 of 2002 by order dated 20-1-2003. 7. In a situation like the one emerging from the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ich is also subject matter of section 15 of SICA then this Court can always safeguard the interest of creditor and pass appropriate directions. As observed supra, there is neither any prohibition, nor any embargo in granting such indulgence which could be pointed out to me either under Companies Act or SICA. 9. Learned counsel for the petitioner then submitted that if, the reference is eventually dismissed by the BIFR under SICA then in that event, the petitioner s right to prosecute this company petition would be taken away. I do not agree. This Court expressly reserve this right of the petitioner to file winding-up petition against the respondent-company on this very cause of action in the event of such eventuality arising in future ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tion, if this Court has allowed indulgence of participation in the inquiry proceedings before BIFR, it will not in any way violate the mandate of section 22 ibid. 11. Accordingly and in view of aforesaid discussion, these petitions are disposed of by making aforementioned observations and liberty granted to the petitioners. The petitioners of these company petitions will be free to participate in the inquiry proceedings before BIFR in the reference case No. 303 of 2002 in support of their debts. The BIFR will ensure disposal of the reference case No. 303 of 2002 in relation to respondent- company expeditiously and as already directed in accordance with law within the time already fixed. The Registry of this Court is directed to send t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
