2002 (11) TMI 690

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Satapathy, Member (T)]. This stay application relates to Order-in-original dated 27-12-2001 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-II classifying Trineursol-H under sub-heading 2936.00 and confirming a differential duty demand of Rs. 21,32,940.00 and imposing penalty of Rs. 12,35,606/- under Section 11 AC and another amount of Rs. 5 lakhs under Rule 173Q. It is the contention .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the appellants, therefore the question of invoking the extended time limit does not arise. 2. Shri M.H. Sheikh, learned JDR appearing for the Revenue states that there was a writ petition filed in 1993 for prohibiting the manufacture of the said product on the ground that there was no therapeutic justification for the same. The appellants must be aware of this petition but they never brought th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X