2003 (12) TMI 341

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... [Order]. Heard both sides. 2. This is a request for condonation of delay of 77 days in filing the appeal against the order-in-appeal. The ld. Counsel pleads that, the copy of the impugned order was delivered to the Security personnel of the factory which was lying closed. The said copy delivered to the Security personnel, did not reach the authorised personnel of the appellants. On rec .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ). But after the hearing, as can be seen from the face of the order the same was apparently not even despatched to him so that he could inform the appellant about its detail. 4. The ld. DR has vehemently argued that, there is a delay in filing this appeal. 5. On considering the submissions of the appellants it is noted that, since the factory was closed in a situation like this, the lack of co .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X