2004 (5) TMI 327

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... esh Kashyap for the Applicant. B.K. Sharma and B.C. Meena for the Respondent. ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties on the admission of the application and perused the contents thereof. 2. Admit. Issue notice to the respondent. 3. Mr. B.C. Meena, the Official Liquidator, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent, thus notice needs not to issue. Service is complet .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . 6. In view of these facts, prima facie , I am satisfied that no such leave is required but as in the writ petition the court has asked the applicants to seek the leave of the Company Court, accordingly same is accorded. 7. The application is allowed. The applicants are permitted to prosecute their writ petition being S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2900/2000, before the Bench concerned. - .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X