9911796707
TMI Blog2006 (5) TMI 184X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... enon for the Respondent. JUDGMENT Bhaskar Bhattacharya, J. - This appeal is at the instance of the company in a proceeding for winding up and is directed against the order dated 27-3-2003, passed by a learned Single Judge thereby admitting a winding up petition to the tune of Rs. 3,20,000, with further direction upon the company to give a bank guarantee to the tune of Rs. 2,50,000 for t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... instalments. However, the learned Judge further directed the company to give a bank-guarantee to the extent of Rs. 2,50,000 for protecting the claim of the creditor for the balance amount for which the respondent was asked to seek remedy before the civil court with a further direction that if the creditor did not file the suit within four weeks from that date for the balance amount, the company wo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... re judgment in the suit that would be filed by the creditor. 7. The learned advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent, however, supported the order passed by the learned trial Judge and contended that there was no bar in passing such order even though his client has been asked to approach the civil court for the remedy. 8. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and after going ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e of securing the disputed claim of the creditor. 10. We thus find that the portion of the order impugned by which the carried trial Judge directed the company to give a bank guarantee to the extent of Rs. 2,50,000 for the purpose of securing the disputed claim of the creditor cannot be supported and is liable to be set aside because such order was passed without having any jurisdiction to dec ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
