2003 (9) TMI 633

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rder]. This appeal has been filed by the appellants against the impugned order-in-appeal dated 20-3-2003 vide which the appeal had been rejected by the Commissioner (Appeals) having been not filed by the appellant-firm, but by the third person to whom neither show cause notice was issued or personal penalty was imposed in the order-in-original by the adjudicating authority. 2. The learned .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ut gave option to the firm to get the same redeemed on payment of redemption fine of Rs. 40,000/- and further imposed penalty of Rs. 25,000/- on the firm. 4. No appeal against the above said order of the adjudicating authority was filed by the firm M/s. Smart Rubber Industries (the present appellant). The appeal was filed by Shri Ajay Arora wherein he described himself as Managing Director of th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X