9911796707
TMI Blog2004 (2) TMI 512X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... vocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : Justice K.K. Usha, President]. - This is an appeal at the instance of Revenue challenging the order passed by the Commissioner dated 5-5-1992. Dispute relates to the issue whether the Commissioner was justified in accepting the plea of the appellant that a certain portion of effluents forming during the manufacturing process had been drained out into the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... at the department has not proved that the assessee has not as a matter of fact drained out such effluent to the canal as it claimed but, on the other hand, effected sale of the same for a price. He also took the view that the department has failed to prove that such effluent which had been drained out into the canal had marketability. The Commissioner further held that the removal of effluent cann ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ave been drained out into the canal has to be treated as having marketability and therefore, liable to duty. 4. We do not find any merit in the contention raised by the appellant. No material had been placed before the Commissioner or before us in support of the Revenue's contention that there was clandestine removal. There is also no evidence that such effluent drained into the canal was ha ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
