2004 (5) TMI 336

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rder per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J) (Oral)]. The application for condonation of delay was taken up and considered. The impugned Order was passed on 18-1-2002 and issued on 30-1-2002. The appellant, in E.A. 3 form, has stated that the order was communicated to them on 1-3-2002. The appeal has been filed on 31-10-2002 much beyond the period of limitation. The appeal is ought to have been filed .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... lants did not have the records with them. The learned JCDR submits that it is not the case of the appellants that they did not have the copy of the impugned order and submits that the delay has not been explained. Since negligence is patent on record she prays for dismissal. 4. On a careful consideration, it is seen from the affidavit of one Mr. Sampath that the premises was seized by KSFC on 10 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X