2004 (7) TMI 386

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t. [Order per : Moheb Ali M., Member (T)]. The above miscellaneous application seeking modification of the Stay Order No. S/562/WZB/2004/C-I pronounced on 12-3-2004 came up for consideration on 2-6-2004. The Bench in the above cited order directed the applicants to deposit Rs. 6,50,000/- towards duty demanded within eight weeks and report compliance on 31-5-2004. 2. The issue pertained .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed by the applicant, including the submission that under Rule 21 of the Customs Tariff (Anti- dumping Duty on Dumped Articles) Rules, 1995 which inter alia prescribed that the difference between the duty provisionally determined and the one finally determined shall not be demanded, and directed pre-deposit of Rs. 6,50,000/- pending the final outcome of the appeal. The Bench was of the view that Ru .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X