2004 (5) TMI 419

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... vocate, for the Respondent. [Order]. - This is a Revenue's appeal against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) who in the impugned order set aside the order passed by the lower authority on the grounds that it is a non-speaking order and passed without application of mind. The Commissioner (Appeals) found that the lower authority while adjudicating the case has not given any justification or .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... olved is up to Rs. 10 lakhs. The second ground of the revenue is that the issue decided by the Jt. Commissioner is the one mentioned that Para 12(2) of page 6 of show cause notice. However, the Jt. Commissioner wrongly mentioned Para 2 of page 6 due to typographical mistake. 3. The issue is whether the Jt. Commissioner was right in adjudicating the show cause notice answerable to the Commiss .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e him the original authority was dealing with the issue of non-accounting of finished goods in RG1 maintained by the respondents. These goods were accounted for and were subsequently cleared on payment of duty. The original authority confirmed this duty and but since the goods were already released he imposed a fine of Rs. 50,000/- on the goods. Strictly speaking what the Commissioner has set asid .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X