2004 (7) TMI 463

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r per : S.S. Sekhon, Member (T)]. The appellant has been imposed a penalty under Section 112(a) the Customs Act, 1962 and the appeal against them. 2. After hearing both sides and considering the material it is found - (a) The Commissioner arrived at the following - It can be seen that the fact regarding undervaluation has been accepted by Shri Ashwin Doshi and Shri Doshi has also p .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... and reject the subsequent retraction as an after thought. Therefore the appellant has been imposed a penalty of Rs. 1,50,000/- under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act. (b) After appreciating the role of the appellant herein, it can be safely concluded that his interest in the import was that of a financier. Therefore, he was reportedly assisting the import. The Customs Act defi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ing at the specific acts under Section 112(a) on the appellants part. 2. Since the confiscation of the goods imported has been held to be only under Section 111(m) and the appellant had no role to play as regards the declarations to be made on the entry as prescribed therein? An entry as per definition applicable to Customs Act, 1962 would they be Bills of Entry in their case. No declaration .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X