9911796707
TMI Blog2003 (10) TMI 604X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... arelkar, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Moheb Ali M., Member (T)] The applicant is a Custom House Agent, a licence holder issued under Custom House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984 (hereinafter referred to as CHALR, 1984 ). The licence was revoked by an order dated 1-8-2003 against which the present application has been filed. 2. It appears that certain investigations were co ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ting as CHA misdeclaring the quantity and quality of the export for M/s. Siddhnath Shipping, violated the provisions of CHALR, 1984. In an appeal preferred against the order of suspension, this Tribunal vide their order dated 22-7-2002 set aside the suspension order, making it clear that the enquiry instituted in the case of alleged misdeclaration could be concluded and the revocation of suspensio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nd the reliance placed by the learned Advocate on the case of Express Kargo Forwarders Pvt. Ltd. v. C.C., Bangalore - 2002 (143) E.L.T. 128 (Tribunal) and other decisions relied upon, it is found that no case has been made out by the applicants to invoke the inherent powers of this Tribunal to grant a stay of the operation of the revocation order. The facts and circumstances in the present case ar ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... or invoking the inherent jurisdiction to stay the revocation order under CHALR, 1984. Therefore, we refrain from passing a stay of the operation of the said order pending final hearing of this appeal. 5. While rejecting the stay application, applicants request for early hearing has been granted and the matter is fixed for hearing on 19th January, 2004. The stay application is dismissed. 6. Or ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
