2004 (6) TMI 461

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pondent. [Order per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J) (Oral)]. - These applications, filed by the appellants, pray for restoration of the respective appeals which were dismissed under Rule 11 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules as per Final Order Nos. 1072-1073/2003, dated 16-12-2003. The said final order noted that the appellants had refused to accept the hearing notice issued by the Tribunal. 2. Th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... oversight. We have heard the DR also. 3. The Counsel for the appellants submitted that, if any hearing notice was refused to be received, it might have happened so for want of any responsible person in the office of the company. Even though, these submissions are not very impressive, we take note of one statement of Shri Rajendra Pathak, which we have come across in the affidavit. The statement .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X