2003 (10) TMI 539

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . Tata, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Justice K.K. Usha, President]. We heard ld. Counsel for the appellant as well as ld. DR for the Revenue. Two issues are involved in this appeal. Firstly, whether the value of the computers which were supplied by the appellant directly to the BSNL can be added to the value of three items which were removed from the factory namely BSM, BSC and .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X