9911796707
TMI Blog2010 (5) TMI 378X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er of the Notified Area Office of GIDC to issue No Objection to the applicant without insisting the applicant to pay the arrears of tax up to the date of confirmation of sale of the land covered by Lot No. V, i.e., land bearing Survey No. 368, admeasuring 33790.78 Sq. Mtrs. situated in village Karamsad, District: Anand in the interest of justice and equity; Without prejudice to the above relief and in the alternative (B) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the respondent No. 2-Chief Officer of the Notified Area Office of GIDC to issue No Objection to the applicant without insisting the applicant to pay the arrears of tax upto the date of winding up of the company in liquidation in respect of the land covered by Lot No. V, i.e., l ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ereupon addressed a detailed representation dated 11-3-2010 to the respondent No. 2 pointing out that applicant being the auction purchaser is not liable to pay outstanding dues of the company in liquidation as claimed by the respondent No. 2 and the respondent No. 2 has objected to lodge the claim with the Official Liquidator and the Official Liquidator, in turn, is obliged to settle the dues of respondent No. 2 in accordance with provisions of the section 530 of the Act. It is submitted that still the respondent No. 2 is insisting that the applicant shall pay the entire amount of tax liability and therefore, the applicant has preferred the present application. Shri Pahwa, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant has submitted ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ' in favour of the applicant. Shri Pahwa, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant has submitted that as such, the applicant is ready and willing to pay whatever the amount is outstanding towards tax, water charges and drainage charges for the period post-winding up and the same shall be deposited with the respondent No. 2 within a period of 21 days from today. Shri Pahwa, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant has relied upon the decision of this court rendered in Company Application No. 474 of 2009. 4. Shri N.V. Anjariya, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent No. 2 has submitted that the respondent No. 2 shall inform the petitioner about the amount outstanding towards Notified Area tax water c ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
