9911796707
TMI Blog2003 (10) TMI 588X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... [Order]. Heard both sides. 2. The appellants appeal is directed against the demand of Rs. 7,98,698/-. 3. The demand arose on account of dispute relating to Modvat credit taken against certain invoices in respect of which the Central Excise Authorities had raised certain objection. In the synopsis provided during the hearing, the learned Counsel informs that, credit for a major amount of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ified in terms of Larger Bench judgment of the Tribunal in the case of Kamakhya Steels (Supra). So far as the disallowance of claim for credit of Rs. 20,200/- on Spinnerete is concerned, it is stated in the show cause notices that, the payment is in respect of labour charge for procuring said Spinnerettes. The appellants deny this allegation. The appellants sent old and worn out spinnerettes to a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... in respect of (1) credit taken on commercial invoices (Amounting to Rs. 1736/-), (2) invoices not in the name of the appellants (amounting to Rs. 2843/-) (3) credit taken twice (Rs. 3,10,041/-) and (4) the excess credit taken (Rs. 1,081/-), these have not been pressed during the hearing. Hence these are to be rejected as being unsubstantiated and are so rejected. 5. So far as, the credit taken ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s on the ground of late declaration or non-declaration, is permitted, (b) Claims in respect of Modvat credit taken on commercial invoice (Rs. 1,736/-) and on the basis of invoices not being in their name (Rs. 2,843/-) are rejected. (c) The claims for credit taken on original invoices Sr. Nos. 34 and 39 of the show cause Notice dated 22 September 1995 (Rs. 3,067/- and Rs. 1,366/-, re ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
