2009 (10) TMI 539

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Kumar Mihir for the Petitioner Sudipto Sarkar, C.S. Vaidyanathan, Ciccu Mukhopadhaya, Manu Nair, Abhijeet Sinha and Arun Mohan for the Respondent ORDER 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 29 July, 2009, of the Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court whereby it vacated the interim order passed by the learned Single Judge in GA No. 678 of 2009 in CS No. 69 of 2 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... dge to decide the injunction application at the earliest. 3. In our view, the division bench should have examined the entire issue in the light of the pleadings of the parties and documents produced by them and then decide whether the ad interim order passed by the learned Single Judge deserves to be continued or vacated. We are further of the view that ends of justice will be met and the litigat .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ntinue for a further period of three months or till the disposal of the injunction application by the division bench of the High Court, whichever is earlier. 5. We make it clear that it would be open for the parties to move this court for an appropriate order in the event the injunction application is not decided within the time specified by us herein above.
Case laws, Decisions, Judgements, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X