TMI Blog2004 (7) TMI 531X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J) (Oral)]. The appellant s Company is a PSU unit who have been granted permission by the Committee of Secretaries to contest the appeal. The appellants are required to pre-deposit duty amount of Rs. 2,28,16,941/- and like amount of penalty. The appellants have cleared Parts of Main Battle Tank, Parts of Laser Range Fighter, components, spa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pellants for supply through special contractor as in the case of Tata Electronic Devpt. Services v. CCE, Bangalore - 1999 (107) E.L.T. 86 (Tribunal). He further relies on the judgments rendered by the Tribunal in the case of Uday Computer Aided Mfg. (P) Ltd. v. CCE, Bangalore - 1998 (98) E.L.T. 470 (Tribunal) and in case of Delco Incorporated v. CCE, Bangalore - 2000 (117) E.L.T. 725 (Tribunal). H ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of the prima facie nature of the case in favour of the appellants, the stay application is allowed by granting waiver of pre-deposit of disputed amount and staying recovery till disposal of the appeal. 5. As the amount involved in the matter is high, therefore the appeal is to be heard out of turn. The appeal to come up for final hearing on 30th November, 2004. - - TaxTMI - TMITax - Central ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|