2004 (6) TMI 555

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... [Order].- This appeal has been filed by the appellants against the communication dated 20-2-2003 received by them from the Superintendent about the rejection of their abatement claim under Rule 49 on account of destruction of their goods in storm on 3-6-2004 (sic). This letter is liable to be quashed on the face of it as under the law, the Commissioner himself has to pass speaking order on .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X