2004 (9) TMI 479

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Kang, Vice-President]. Heard both sides. The Applicants filed this application for waiver of pre-deposit of duty Rs. 4.65 crores and penalty of equivalent amount and also for personal penalties. In this case demand is confirmed on the ground that the present Appellants suppressed the price of the goods cleared by them. The contention of the Applicants is .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... every time for all the future periods to uncover the same set of evidences. 2. Taking into facts and circumstances of the case we are of the view that prima facie the applicants have a strong case in their favour as the Adjudication Order is based on the evidences collected in respect of an earlier Adjudication Order and no investigation is conducted for the period of present demand. Therefore, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X