2004 (9) TMI 542

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ant. Shri N.K. Mishra, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : V.K. Jain, Member (T)]. - Heard Shri N.C. Roychowdhury, Sr. Advocate for the Appellant on condonation of delay. He has submitted a list of dates in respect of the appeals filed by the appellant which is taken on record. In this case the appellant approached the High Power Committee of Cabinet Secretary for permission to file .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... y Court or Tribunal without a clearance for litigation by such committee . Keeping the above observations of the Hon ble Supreme Court in view and after hearing both sides, we condone the delay in terms of Section 35B(5) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 as there was sufficient cause for not presenting the appeal within the time. 4. We have heard both the sides for early hearing. Both sides have .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X