2005 (1) TMI 487

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ent. [Order per : T.K. Jayaraman, Member (T) (Oral)]. This ROM application has been filed against the Final Order Nos. 1561 to 1566/2004, dated 28-9-2004 [2005 (180) E.L.T. 350 (T)]. The learned Senior Advocate appearing for the appellant submitted that there is a mistake in paras 6 and 7 of the said final order, wherein it has been recorded that the Supreme Court has upheld the decisio .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... by the Revenue in the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court rejected the stay of the CEGAT s order classifying the goods as products of printing industry. Moreover she contended that the appellants are not the manufacturers of the impugned products and if at all there is any manufacture the job workers only should be liable. 7. On a careful consideration of the matter we find that the classificat .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X