2004 (2) TMI 644

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... llant. Ms. Charul Baranwal, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.S. Bajaj, Member (J)]. Through the present ROM, the appellants have sought the recall of the Final order dated 22-2-2002 [2002 (142) E.L.T. 106 (Tri. - Del.)] of the Tribunal by which their appeal against the order in original of the Commissioner of Central Excise dated 27-7-2001 was dismissed. The appellant have fil .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tances and evidence had been considered and discussed in paras 4, 5, 6, 7 8 of the impugned final order. The ratio of the law laid down in both the above referred cases had also been discussed in para 5 of the order. 5. It is well settled that scope of ROM is quite limited under the law. The mistake of fact or law apparent on the record only can be corrected by the Tribunal/Courts, while deali .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X