2004 (12) TMI 533

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... er : S.S. Kang, Vice-President]. Heard both sides. 2. Appellant filed this appeal against the adjudication order passed by the Commissioner of Customs whereby the value of the goods imported by the appellants i.e. embellishment Compatible Rolls is enhanced on the basis of the contemporaneous import made by the other importers M/s. Akashdeep Impex, Chennai and M/s. Sun and Suns, New Delhi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the other importer, therefore, the goods cannot be compared with the goods imported by the other importer. 4. The contention of the Revenue is that all the goods were imported from Taiwan and these goods were interchangeable. Therefore, the value declared by the appellant was not accepted by the Revenue and it was rightly enhanced on the basis of contemporaneous import. 5. We find that in this .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X