Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2005 (6) TMI 329

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... o, Member (J)]. The short issue arising from this appeal of the Revenue is whether the goods imported by the respondents and cleared under Bill of Entry dated 10-12-90 were eligible for the benefit of Notification No. 217/86-C.E. According to the appellant, the Notification is not applicable to imported inputs inasmuch as it extended the benefit of exemption to goods manufactured in a facto .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the concessions notified could be of any kind and even in the notifications under our consideration, they are many and varied. In respect of items falling under S.Nos. 3 and 8, in particular, the actual users may be private individuals or authorities and need not necessarily be manufacturers using the goods in question is an industrial process in a narrow sense of that term. For instance, any co .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 92 turns only on the nature and use to which the goods are put by the user or purchasers thereof and on whether he has gone through the procedure outlined in Chapter X, it would not be correct to deny it to a supplier of such goods on the ground that he is an importer and not a manufacturer. That aspect is provided for by Section 3(1) of C.T. Act which specifically mandates that the CVD will be eq .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed in Hyderabad Industries Ltd. v. UOI, 1999 (108) E.L.T. 321 (S.C.), by a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court. 3. After giving careful consideration to the rival arguments, we are unable to accept the logic presented by learned counsel. In the case of Thermax Pvt. Ltd. (supra), the issue which arose for consideration of the Apex Court was whether the benefit of Notification No. 63/85-C.E., .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nsumed in the manufacture of final product in the same factory. The goods in question were not manufactured in the respondents factory. They were imported and used in the factory for the manufacture of final product. Such use is not captive consumption. Notification No. 217/86-C.E. is applicable only to inputs manufactured and captively consumed in a factory. Hence it is not applicable to the sub .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates