2005 (2) TMI 681

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... [Order per : Moheb Ali M., Member (T)]. The stay application arose out of the order of Commissioner (Appeals) who in the impugned order confirmed the order of the lower authority demanding a sum of Rs. 51,63,623/- towards the differential duty payable on the revised value arrived at for the metal containers manufactured and cleared by the applicant during the period July, 1998 to January, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Tribunal in Essel Packaging Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai [2004 (174) E.L.T. 265] the Tribunal held that caps of Toothpaste tubes are accessories. In the case of Shalimar Tubes Industries Ltd. v. Union of India [1994 (74) E.L.T. 520 (Bom.)], the Hon ble Bombay High Court held that the value of plastic caps are not to be included in the assessable value of extruded aluminium tub .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X