2005 (6) TMI 391

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... i B.L. Goel, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Justice R.K. Abichandani, President]. The applicants prays for condonation of delay of 204 days in the filing of the appeals. According to the applicants though the impugned order was passed on 17th May, 2004, it was not received by or served upon the applicants and the applicants were only handed over a photocopy of the order on 13-1-2 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... According to the applicant, the learned Commissioner passed an ex parte order since nobody appeared on behalf of the applicant due to the reasons mentioned in the application. The learned Counsel for the applicant contended that in view of the facts stated in the application, the applicant has made out a good ground for condonation of delay. 3.The learned Authorised Representative for the Depar .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... eived by them, the appeal and the stay application were filed on 10th March, 2005 within 90 days from the date of receipt of the order. The applicant has, in our view, made out a sufficient ground for condonation of the delay in filing of the appeals. The delay in filing of the appeals is, therefore, condoned and the applications are accordingly allowed. The stay applications will now come up for .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X