TMI Blog2005 (4) TMI 472X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... has appeared for the appellants. Letter has been received from the Authorised Signatory of the appellants expressing inability to appear due to some pre-occupation with other works. I do not find its sufficient ground under the law for adjourning the matter. Therefore, I proceed to decide the stay application after hearing the JDR. 2.On perusal of the record, it is evident that duty demand of R ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ave not charged the price, it is their fault and they cannot claim any capital out of that. Therefore, appellants have no strong case on merits. They are directed to pre-deposit of the entire amount, detailed above within eight weeks from today. On making the deposit, the deposit of penalty amount of Rs. 40,000/- shall stand waived till the disposal of the appeal. But in the event of their failure ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|