2005 (4) TMI 478

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pondent. [Order]. Vide his impugned order, the Commissioner of Central Excise Mumbai, has dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants as time-barred. 2.The impugned order was passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise on 30-9-1999. However, as per the appellants, they came to know about the said order only when their jurisdictional Central Excise authorities approached them f .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he appellants and has rejected the appeal on the point of time-barred. The same contentions have been re-iterated before me by the ld. Advocate Shri D.M. Mishra, appearing for the appellants I have also heard ld. DR, who submits that the appeal having been admittedly filed after a period of three months from the date of receipt of the order, the same has been rightly rejected by the Commissioner ( .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X