TMI Blog2005 (5) TMI 500X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Sanyal, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : V.K. Jain, Member (T)]. Heard Shri B.N. Chattopadhyay, learned Consultant on the M.A. filed on 11-5-2005 for non-implementation of Tribunal s order. He submits that in pursuance of the Tribunal s order dated 21 August, 2002, the appellant has deposited Rs. 10.00 lakhs. Finally, the Tribunal decided the matter in their favour by its order dat ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ities have not bothered to implement the order of the Tribunal. The Revenue has not obtained a stay against the order of the Tribunal. Therefore, simply mentioning that CESTAT order has not been accepted by the Departmental Authority conveyed by Supdt. [is nothing but disrespect shown to the Tribunal as well as to other judicial forums]. It is their duty to follow the directions issued in the orde ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|