2005 (7) TMI 472

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J) (Oral)]. The appellants are aggrieved with the Order-in-Appeal No. 94/2005-C.E., dated 29-3-2005 upholding the recovery of duty amount of Rs. 4,21,658/- and penalty of Rs. 1,50,000/- on the ground that 0.01% of Dharmada charges is required to be added in the assessable value. The learned Counsel submits that three Judges Bench of the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X