2005 (4) TMI 507

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Shri P.K. Bishnu, Manager (Legal) for the appellants and Shri J.R. Madhiam, ld. JDR for the respondents. 2. Shri Bishnu submits that the items were urgently required by the appellant s job worker. On 27-8-1999, the appellant sought permission from the Commissioner of Central Excise, Calcutta-I vide their letter dated 27th August, 1999 along with the required undertaking. An intimation to remove .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... fore, he submits that the impugned order is in consonance with law and rules. So, the appeal may be dismissed. 4. After hearing both sides, I find that the appellant has admitted that the goods were received on 27th August, 1999 and on the very day, they despatched to the job workers. No permission was obtained from the Commissioner as it is required under Rule 57S(8). Therefore, The Assistant C .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X