2005 (8) TMI 509

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... inghal, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Moheb Ali M., Member (T)]. The appellants manufactured different Petrochemicals and Chemicals during the relevant period (October 1993 to February 1994) C4 Raffinate (LPGs) was one of the products manufactured by them and supplied to M/s. Gujarat Petrosynthese Ltd. through pipeline. The said goods fall under Chapter Heading 2711.19. The appel .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he important component of C4 in the processes. It was the residence of C4 Raffinate that was returned to the appellant and was therefore different from the one originally sent. Stating this the Commissioner upheld the lower authority s order rejecting the refund claim for duty paid on the return stream of C4R. 2. Heard both sides. 3. The Commissioner says that what is returned to the appellant .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X