2005 (9) TMI 470

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e, for the Respondent. [Order]. The Revenue is in appeal aggrieved by an Order of the Commissioner of Central Excise dated 17-6-2003. 2. The Commissioner (Appeals) in his impugned order in para 6 has observed as follows:- 6. However, I find that the appellants have taken the plea that the show cause notice is time barred in as much as they had not hidden any facts from the departmen .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed . 3. The Department relied on the decision of M/s. Nizam Sugar Factory v. CCE, Hyderabad, reported in 1999 (114) E.L.T. 429 (Tri.-LB), wherein it was held that limitation of five years is available even when the Department had knowledge about suppression, fraud etc.,- Period of five years provided under proviso to Section 11A(i) for demanding duty not curtailable, because the Department had k .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X