2006 (2) TMI 330

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... R, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Sekhon, Member (T)]. Heard both sides. 2. The appellant are a CHA with Mumbai Customs House and their licence has been suspended vide an order dated 19-1-2006 by the Commissioner of Customs (General) New Custom House, Mumbai, on receipt of certain information received from Commissioner of Customs, Amritsar, who had suspended the licence of the v .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... lowed. Since no contrary decision has been shown to us, we follow this settled position to arrive at not upholding the present order of suspension. Reliance of Ld. DR on the case of decision of the Calcutta High Court in the case of Orient Clearing Forwarding Agency v. Union of India - 2001 (136) E.L.T. 3 (Cal.) and the submission that no enquiry was required to be effected by the Commissioner .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... we find that there is no cause for suspension, nor there is a nexus in time or facts with the alleged act to call for suspension of the operation of a licence at Mumbai Customs House. We therefore, set aside the order of the suspension impugned before us. 4. We make it clear that setting aside this order of the suspension will not give any right whatsoever to the applicant, if any, further enqu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X